No products in the cart.
- Latest
- Trending
ADVERTISEMENT
At the end of November, an unknown person signed a signature associated with a very old block reward mined on January 19, 2009, and a user posted a message linked to the reward and a verified signature on the forum bitcointalk.org. released. The message was associated with Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin address associated with block 1,018, a block reward issued 16 days after he launched the network. Upon further investigation, on-chain data links block 1,018 to a number of block rewards ostensibly mined by Halfini, and the signed block is also connected to the first Bitcoin transaction derived from block 9. indicates that
On November 26, 2022, the newly created bitcointalk.org forum account “one signatureIt shocked the cryptocurrency community when an unknown individual signed a message associated with Block 1,018.One Signatures message was included new BTC address Created in 2022, also unknown signed the new address It also proves the existence of the user.
According to the signed message Bitcoin.com Validator Electrum wallets are authentic signatures associated with 2009 addresses.1N Chf or Block 1,018. Block 1,018 and Bitcoin address 1NChf are both linked to the first block. Bitcoin 10 Saw Transactions Bitcoin Sent from Satoshi Nakamoto to Hal Finney, a large amount of Bitcoin Blocks associated with Finney.
For example, on March 25, 2014, journalist Andy Greenberg published an article about Hal Finney’s life and relationship with Bitcoin. In the article, Greenberg said he was allowed to see emails sent by Nakamoto to Finney, and Hal’s son, Jason Finney, showed Greenberg his father’s emails. Bitcoin showing wallet first bitcoin transaction.
First transaction was 10 Bitcoin Sent on January 12, 2009 and confirmed at a block height of 170. Bitcoin Sent to Finney that day, Satoshi sent it 4 more trades From block 9. 2 transfers of 10 Bitcoin And two transactions that sent one bitcoin each.
The Greenberg article presents an alleged screenshot of Hal Finney’s wallet. Bitcoin The transaction also shows 12 block subsidies allegedly mined by Finney. The screenshot shows Finney mining his reward on January 10, 2009. It was the same day as Finney. Said The World Where He Was Operating Bitcoin Social media platform Twitter.
bitcoin run
Half-in (@halfin) January 11, 2009
moreover, block 78 Associated with Phinney’s mined bitcoin rewards and series of transactions.Block rewards pictured in Greenberg’s article, alongside Block 78 and the first 10 Bitcoin All of these transactions are linked to the 2009 address 1NChf signed by Onesignature on November 26th. Bitcoin blocks indicates that Finney has mined quite a few block rewards.
In fact, our analysis found that 1NChf was linked to about 36 block rewards that the tool could find, and that all rewards found were related to Finney’s mining period. 1NChf is also associated with numerous coinbase rewards that our team has yet to discover. Further investigation revealed that 1NChf was associated with large block rewards sent in batches of thousands. Bitcoin June 14, 2011 at approximately 5:00 am ET. According to our on-chain investigation results, some of Finney’s blocks were also moved in his April 2013.
Several Consolidated transaction Associated with your Bitstamp.net deposit address and some of the connected funds Mt Gox addressThe block associated with 1NChf in the Onesignature contains the block 78, 320, 329, 357, 361, 372, 407, 413, 419, 490, 528, 567, 596When 651Blocks belonging to .1NChf go all the way to the height of the block 7,569, 7,828, And possibly even higher.
All blocks linked to 1NChf in Onesignature are ostensibly related to blocks associated with Hal Finney, and none of the connected blocks match. patriotic block patterni.e. 1NChf and block 1,018 is not Satoshi Block. It is well understood that Nakamoto he may have mined between 700,000 and 1.1 million. Bitcoinbut a common misconception is that this stash is not integrated.
Analyzing the first 1,025 mined Bitcoin The data shows that almost all blocks mined by Nakamoto are unused, with the exception of block 9 transactions. After 5 transactions from block 9, we are at 18.43. Bitcoin Wallets and some funds come from dust transactions. The reason for Onesignature is not entirely clear. shared a message Signed 26 November. Some say this is “flex”, others argue that the signing thread could be a spoof. One of her users in her Bitcointalk.org post called franky1 said that this is likely the case and that signature signatures also could be tricked.
1NChf and block 1,018 addresses purchased to someone later. People are known to want to buy old addresses, and these solicitations can be found on Reddit and bitcointalk.org. In any case, 1NChf and block 1,018 addresses are associated with some very special transactions and mined blocks that are very likely connected to Finney.
computer scientist, Hal Finneyrespected by many in the Bitcoin community, passed away in August 2014 after suffering complications from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). beggar Twitter owner Elon Musk has indicated that he will retain Finney’s Twitter account.Finney denied being the creator of Bitcoin before his death, but many members of the cryptocurrency community sincerely believe he was the creatorOur on-chain analysis says nothing of the kind, but on-chain links and heuristics 1NChf and block 1,018 addressesand Hal Finney’s mined Bitcoin and related transactions.
Joshua Redman helped report this article and contributed to the research.
What do you think of the connection between 1NChf and block 1,018 addresses and the ostensible blocks and transactions associated with Hal Finney? Let us know what you think about this in the comments section below.
image creditBy: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Editorial Photo Credits: Joshua Redman, Andy Greenberg, Forbes,
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin.com It is not intended to provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. NEITHER THE COMPANY NOR THE AUTHOR WILL BE LIABLE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FOR ANY DAMAGE OR LOSS ARISING OR ALLEGED TO OCCUR ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO YOUR USE OF OR RELIANCE ON ANY CONTENT, PRODUCTS OR SERVICES DESCRIBED IN THIS ARTICLE. We are not responsible.
